<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>apocryph.org &#187; star trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apocryph.org/tag/star-trek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apocryph.org</link>
	<description>Notes to my future self</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Saw new Trek movie (Contains Spoilers)</title>
		<link>http://apocryph.org/2009/05/26/saw-new-trek-movie-contains-spoilers/</link>
		<comments>http://apocryph.org/2009/05/26/saw-new-trek-movie-contains-spoilers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apocryph.org/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I broke my own long-standing prohibition on movie theaters and saw the new Star Trek movie yesterday.  I went in with high hopes given widespread praise the film has received, but came out disappointed. The movie opens with a temporal parodox event that branches the movie on to an alternate timeline, which then gives the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I broke my own long-standing prohibition on movie theaters and saw the new <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek </a>movie yesterday.  I went in with high hopes given widespread praise the film has received, but came out disappointed.</p>
<p>The movie opens with a temporal parodox event that branches the movie on to an alternate timeline, which then gives the film a free hand to ignore all the Trek canon and go in a different and unexpected direction.  While this is at least an attempt to pay homage to existing canon, something the asshat Rick Berman wouldn&#8217;t even bother with, it changes the movie completely.  </p>
<p>Going in I expected to see some some additional light shed on the background of TOS crew and perhaps a twist both unexpected and consistent with existing canon.  What I got instead was the groundwork for an entirely new universe of Trek, built on the somewhat shoddy foundation of a heretofore unknown time warp.  Not exactly the resounding reboot of the franchise I was hoping for.</p>
<p>Notwithstanding these structural deficiencies, I found the dialog between the characters to be somewhat formulaic for modern action films, as though the movie isn&#8217;t taking itself too seriously.  While I&#8217;ve enjoyed many films with this quality, it was overdone for this movie.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought the romance between Spock and Uhura strained credulity, even given the cover of an alternate timeline.</p>
<p>In all this is a disappointing addition to the Trek movie library.  It&#8217;s not the worst Trek movie ever (Star Trek: The Motion Picture clearly holds that honor), but it is far from the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apocryph.org/2009/05/26/saw-new-trek-movie-contains-spoilers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
